For design partners
Bring a consequential workflow with an evidence problem.
The first partnerships should test the method against work where unsupported certainty, missing lineage, or unreviewable automation creates real cost.
A useful starting point
When this is a fit.
- The decision has a describable claim boundary
- Inputs and outcomes can be inspected under an agreed confidentiality model
- A refusal is more valuable than a fabricated answer
- Your team can review what the system files and why it advanced
What the engagement produces
Evidence before expansion.
- A pre-code scope and falsification plan
- A small, bounded pilot rather than an estate-wide replacement
- Evidence artifacts at each decision boundary
- An explicit record of what the pilot does not establish
Begin with the actual problem
No generic sales call required.
Describe the decision, its consequence, and what an unsupported answer would cost. The first response will narrow the claim—not enlarge the commitment.